Is This The End Of The Beginning? US Govt versus World's Big Banks; Cascading Risks Multiply
London, UK - 04th September 2011, 08:30 GMT
Dear ATCA Open & Philanthropia Friends
[Please note that the views presented by individual contributors are not necessarily representative of the views of ATCA, which is neutral. ATCA conducts collective Socratic dialogue on global opportunities and threats.]
Make no mistake about it, history was made on September 2nd, 2011, after the financial markets closed in New York. As Churchill said in 1942, "Now this is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning." What are the unintended consequences of the massive multi-billion-dollar lawsuit in which an independent US Government regulator is suing 17 big banks from the United States, United Kingdom, Germany, Switzerland, Japan and France? As we approach the 3rd anniversary of the collapse of Lehman Brothers on 15th September, 2008, as a result of cascading risks, markets may yet demonstrate extreme volatility once again with fundamentally destabilising consequences.
The end of the beginning?
The billions of dollars in compensation is being sought by the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) over the big banks' packaging and selling of mortgage backed securities in the run-up to the global financial crisis in 2007. FHFA is the US government conservator overseeing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Specifically, the lawsuit alleges negligent misrepresentation, securities laws violations and common fraud as the big banks issued, bundled and sold Mortgage Backed Securities (MBS) to Government Sponsored Enterprises (GES). When financial markets open again on September 5th/6th, disruptive events are likely to unfold as investors around the world respond spontaneously, in knee jerk fashion, to a multiplying set of cascading risks.
Here is a list of the big banks that have been targeted in the lawsuit and how much money the FHFA argues the toxic assets were worth:
1. Bank of America with Countrywide and Merrill Lynch = $57.4 billion (USA)
2. JPMorgan Chase = $33 billion (US)
3. Royal Bank of Scotland = $30.4 billion (UK)
4. Deutsche Bank = $14.2 billion (Germany)
5. Credit Suisse = $14.1 billion (Switzerland)
6. Goldman Sachs = $11.1 billion (US)
7. Morgan Stanley = $10.6 billion (US)
8. HSBC = $6.2 billion (UK)
9. Ally Financial (GMAC) = $6 billion (US)
10. Barclays = $4.9 billion (UK)
11. Citigroup = $3.5 billion (US)
12. Nomura = $2 billion (Japan)
13. Société Générale = $1.3 billion (France)
14. First Horizon = $0.88 billion (US)
15. General Electric = $0.55 billion (US)
Total = $196 billion
In July, the FHFA sued UBS (Switzerland) for at least $900m for its activities as a securitiser of US mortgages, and the latest lawsuit follows a similar mould albeit on a far larger scale.
1. Euro Crisis: Given the suspension of the troika -- IMF, ECB and eurogroup -- talks in regard to the further bailout of Greece, and the growing reluctance of the Germans and other eurozone members to carry out the bailouts, is the timing of this announcement likely to precipitate a perfect storm, greatly amplifying volatility in global financial markets?
2. Schizophrenia: While Edward DeMarco, legally independent head of FHFA, says his job is to protect taxpayers, could his latest actions undermine the US government’s parallel efforts to shore up the housing market and the broader national economy? If banks are likely to hold more capital in reserve against these new litigation risks, will this not lessen the amount they have available to lend?
3. Paralysis: The resolution of this massive lawsuit is likely to take years with a substantial impact on executive decision making within the big banks. If as a result of this lawsuit, interbank lending and banks' credit supply is paralysed, and liquidity evaporates, wouldn't that damage global economic growth and world trade substantially? Banks have already suffered a massive loss of confidence in the wake of The Great Unwind which began in 2007 and remain incredibly fragile. Could the litigation place further costs and uncertainty on the global banking system, which is critical to the smooth-functioning of the world economy?
4. Complicity: Why did it take so long for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to arrive at the revelation that the big banks misled them? Fannie and Freddie took huge losses, but was it partially self-inflicted? Is it plausible that Fannie and Freddie as well as the rating agencies were complicit in the alleged wrongdoing of the big banks?
5. Copycats: What happens when copycat lawsuits commence from major financial institutions who also bought the same mortgage backed securities from the same set of big banks?
1. If the massive lawsuit initiated by the US government regulator FHFA results in a settlement in its favour, the size of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac's taxpayer bailout will be reduced substantially. If the lawsuit is deemed to be too large by the financial markets, then it could play a part in triggering yet another phase of the global financial crisis.
2. Cascading risks, including this massive lawsuit, might cause one or more Lehman Brothers type events not only in America but potentially within Europe.
3. This complex saga demonstrates organisational failure across an intricate spider's web of key players that involves a distributed matrix of financial institutions, credit rating agencies and regulators, as well as mortgage buyers that together underestimated and did not truly understand the entirety of risks they were carrying at any given time.
4. There may have been self-serving collaboration between some of the major players, as financials looking for higher profits lobbied regulators, while credit-rating agencies took hefty commissions from rating as many securities "AAA" as possible.
5. This new litigation sets in motion larger waves in the global financial system. What happens next? Is this the beginning of the end, or the end of the beginning? We suspect the latter and, perhaps, Sir Winston would agree with us!
We are hosting an Expert roundtable on this issue at ATCA 24/7 on Yammer.
Expert roundtables are the newly launched ATCA 24/7 Q&A private exclusive club service. They seek to become the killer application in strategic intelligence by delivering an unprecedented competitive advantage to our distinguished members. They can only be accessed online at https://www.yammer.com/atca
Q1: How to become a privileged member of ATCA 24/7 to participate in the expert roundtables?
A1: i. If you are a distinguished member of ATCA 5000, ATCA Open, The Philanthropia or HQR affiliated groups you may be allowed to become a privileged member of this new and exclusive private club.
ii. If you are pre-invited, visit the private intelligence network -- PIN -- by going to https://www.yammer.com/atca [Note: In https:// 's' is for security and encryption]
iii. If you don't have membership of the PIN yet, email the mi2g Intelligence Unit at intelligence.unit at mi2g dot com for an exclusive invitation.
Q2: How to participate in the expert roundtables and get domain-specific strategic intelligence questions answered?
A2: Access the ATCA 24/7 Private Intelligence Network -- PIN -- online and ask or answer a strategic intelligence question, no matter how complex. Receive expert answers within 24 hours or get pointers from:
i. ATCA 5000 experts who are online;
ii. ATCA Research and Analysis Wing; and
iii. mi2g Intelligence Unit.
Q3: Why is the ATCA 24/7 Q&A Exclusive Club special?
A3: ATCA 24/7 has now created an exclusive private intelligence watering hole and expert roundtable at the highest level where interesting and sophisticated questions are being asked from around the world, and intelligent answers are being provided, almost always by experts who have deep domain-specific knowledge. Come and check out the exclusive club, take it for a strategic test drive, which sign-of-intelligent life are you waiting for?
To learn more about "The Expert Roundtable: ATCA 24/7 Q&A Club" email: intelligence.unit at mi2g.com and if you are already a member visit https://www.yammer.com/atca
We welcome your thoughts, observations and views. To reflect further on this subject and others, please respond within Twitter, Facebook and LinkedIn's ATCA Open and related discussion platform of HQR. Should you wish to connect directly with real time Twitter feeds, please click as appropriate:
. ATCA Open
. mi2g Intelligence Unit
. Open HQR
. DK Matai